Opinion
No. 20-1211
06-18-2020
In re: TINDRICK ZEIGLER, Petitioner.
Tindrick Zeigler, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-hc-02044-FL) Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tindrick Zeigler, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tindrick Zeigler petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order compelling the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to comply with the district court's prior order to reconsider Zeigler's request for nunc pro tunc designation. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court entered an order granting Zeigler's motion to compel BOP to comply with the court's prior order on April 7, 2020, and BOP subsequently complied. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED