From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disciplinary Action Against Zak

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 26, 2001
630 N.W.2d 427 (Minn. 2001)

Opinion

No. C3-98-1923.

Dated: July 26, 2001


ORDER

On August 31, 1999, this Court reinstated respondent Timothy Jay Zak to the practice of law following a 3-month suspension and placed him on supervised probation for 2 years. In re Zak, 598 N.W.2d 692 (Minn. 1999).

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and respondent have entered into a stipulation wherein they jointly recommend that it would be appropriate to immediately discharge respondent from his supervised probation because respondent no longer maintains a law practice and his probation is an undue burden on his ability to register as a financial advisor in other states.

This court has independently reviewed the record and agrees that the jointly recommended discharge is appropriate.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Timothy Jay Zak is hereby discharged from supervised probation.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice


Summaries of

In re Disciplinary Action Against Zak

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 26, 2001
630 N.W.2d 427 (Minn. 2001)
Case details for

In re Disciplinary Action Against Zak

Case Details

Full title:In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Timothy Jay Zak, an…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 26, 2001

Citations

630 N.W.2d 427 (Minn. 2001)