From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Yu

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 2, 2022
No. 2022-1211 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2022-1211

11-02-2022

IN RE: STEVEN SOUNYOUNG YU, SOUNIL YU, Appellants

STEVEN YU, Fairfax, VA, argued for appellants Steven Yu, Sounil Yu. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by MARY L. KELLY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.


This Disposition is Nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/917,789.

STEVEN YU, Fairfax, VA, argued for appellants Steven Yu, Sounil Yu.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by MARY L. KELLY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM.

(CHEN, CLEVENGER, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

In re Yu

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 2, 2022
No. 2022-1211 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 2, 2022)
Case details for

In re Yu

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: STEVEN SOUNYOUNG YU, SOUNIL YU, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-1211 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 2, 2022)