Opinion
No. 13-1256
04-22-2013
In re: ROBERT E. YOUNG Petitioner.
Robert E. Young, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(No. 1-C-T-14612)
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Young, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert E. Young petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling state officials to deposit a sum of money into his prison trust account. We conclude that Young is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Moreover, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969).
The relief sought by Young is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED