From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Young

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2018
165 A.D.3d 1583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

D-134-18

10-25-2018

In the MATTER OF Sarah Neesa YOUNG, an Attorney.

Sarah Neesa Young, Laconia, New Hampshire, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Sarah Neesa Young, Laconia, New Hampshire, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Devine, Clark, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.

Sarah Neesa Young was admitted to practice by this Court in 2014 and lists a business address in Laconia, New Hampshire with the Office of Court Administration. Young seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney, and Young has submitted an affidavit in response.

As is noted by AGC, Young is presently delinquent in her New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to register for the biennial period beginning in 2018 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1). Inasmuch as Young is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action (see Judiciary Law § 468–a [5 ]; Rules of Professional Conduct [ 22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021, 979 N.Y.S.2d 548 [2014] ), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Young must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see Matter of Frank, 146 A.D.3d 1228, 1228–1229, 46 N.Y.S.3d 434 [2017] ).

ORDERED that Sarah Neesa Young's application for permission to resign is denied.

McCarthy, J.P., Devine, Clark, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Young

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2018
165 A.D.3d 1583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

In re Young

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SARAH NEESA YOUNG, an Attorney.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2018

Citations

165 A.D.3d 1583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 7232
84 N.Y.S.3d 389