From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Yammine

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 23, 2022
No. 05-22-00931-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00931-CV

09-23-2022

IN RE WALLY YAMMINE, Relator


Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-00009-C

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE

Before the Court is relator's September 21, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus. In her petition, relator complains about the trial court's failure to rule on her pending motion for default judgment.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has not demonstrated that the trial court clearly abused its discretion.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Yammine

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 23, 2022
No. 05-22-00931-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2022)
Case details for

In re Yammine

Case Details

Full title:IN RE WALLY YAMMINE, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Sep 23, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00931-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2022)