From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Woodlock

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Apr 21, 2022
Criminal Action 1:20-MC-45 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 21, 2022)

Opinion

Criminal Action 1:20-MC-45 1:20-CR-37

04-21-2022

IN RE: SARAH E. WOODLOCK,


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MICHAEL JOHN ALOI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 29, 2020, the Honorable Irene M. Keeley, United States District Judge, referred Defendant to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for Defendant's participation in the Federal Drug Court Program. [ECF No. 20 in Case No. 1:20-CR-37]. On August 20, 2020, Defendant signed the Drug Court Participant Agreement & Waiver of Confidentiality, agreeing to fully comply with all of the program requirements, court orders, and any other orders that govern the conditions of her bond or supervised release, and face sanctions and/or revocation of her bond, probation, or supervised release for committing any misconduct while participating in the program. [ECF No. 39 in Case No. 1:20-MC-45].

Pursuant to the Referral Order, the undersigned is to submit a written Report and Recommendation as to the appropriate disposition of Defendant's participation in the Drug Court Program.

On April 21, 2022, Defendant successfully completed the requirements of the Drug Court Program. The Program requires that Defendant participate in an After-Care Program. On April 20, 2022, Defendant successfully completed the After-Care Program. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant continue to adhere to the Conditions of Release, previously set forth herein. [ECF No. 14 in Case No. 1:20-CR-37].

Furthermore, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the District Judge consider Defendant as having successfully completed the requirements of the Drug Court Program and RECOMMENDS that the case be REMANDED to the District Court pending sentencing.

Any party have fourteen (14) days (filing of objections) from the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation to file with the Clerk of the Court specific written objections identifying the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, and the basis for such objection. A copy of such objections should also be submitted to the Honorable Irene M. Keeley, United States District Judge. Objections shall not exceed ten (10) typewritten pages or twenty (20) handwritten pages, including exhibits, unless accompanied by a motion for leave to exceed the page limitations, consistent with LR PL P 12.

Failure to timely file written objections to the Report and Recommendation as set forth above shall constitute a waiver of de novo review by the District Court and a waiver of appellate review by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984).

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Report and Recommendation to counsel of record, U.S. Probation Officer Jill Henline, and the Honorable Irene M. Keeley, United States District Court Judge.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Woodlock

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Apr 21, 2022
Criminal Action 1:20-MC-45 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 21, 2022)
Case details for

In re Woodlock

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: SARAH E. WOODLOCK,

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Apr 21, 2022

Citations

Criminal Action 1:20-MC-45 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 21, 2022)