In re Wood

1 Citing case

  1. U.S. Claims, Inc. v. Flomenhaft Cannata, LLC

    519 F. Supp. 2d 515 (E.D. Pa. 2006)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that law firm's unmatured contingency fee agreements were accounts rather than general intangibles

    Furthermore, In re Wood, a case cited by Plaintiff in its motion for a different proposition, lends further support to this Court's conclusion that the interests at issue are "accounts" under New York law. 67 B.R. 321 (W.D.N.Y. 1986). Indeed, the security interests at issue in Wood were similar to those in this case: at dispute in Wood was an attorney's assignment to a third party of the proceeds of a number of contingency fee agreements he had with his clients.