From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Winslett

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Feb 20, 2003
No. 11-03-00004-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2003)

Opinion

No. 11-03-00004-CR.

February 20, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

Appeal from Taylor County.

Panel: ARNOT, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., and McCALL, J.


Opinion


This is an appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 31 from the trial court's denial of appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm. On appeal, appellant contends that the evidence at the hearing on his petition failed to show he was the same person named in the Governor's Warrant. When appellant placed his identity in issue at the hearing on his petition, the burden shifted to the State to establish that appellant (the person in custody) was the same person named in the Florida extradition papers. Ex parte Nelson, 594 S.W.2d 67 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Tarlton v. State, 695 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1985, no writ); Ex parte Shoels, 643 S.W.2d 761 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1982, no writ). Taylor County Sheriff's Deputy Brenda Bufkin testified that she was a classification officer and a fugitive coordinator. Deputy Bufkin stated that appellant was "booked into jail" for failure to provided identification, for evading arrest with a vehicle, for unauthorized use of a vehicle, and for being a fugitive from justice in the State of Florida. At the time of his booking, appellant said that his name was Kevin Bradley Winslett and that his address was 24 Lee Road, No. 421, Opelika, Alabama. Appellant further stated that he was 5 foot 5 inches and that he weighed 135 pounds. Prior to the booking, an officer had determined that appellant's date of birth was December 23, 1971. Deputy Bufkin testified that all of this information was identical with the information on the Governor's Warrant except for the weight which was listed as 137 pounds. The State sufficiently established that appellant was the person named in the Governor's Warrant. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the petition. The point of error is overruled. The order of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

In re Winslett

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Feb 20, 2003
No. 11-03-00004-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2003)
Case details for

In re Winslett

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KEVIN B. WINSLETT

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland

Date published: Feb 20, 2003

Citations

No. 11-03-00004-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2003)