From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Winick

United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California
Jun 9, 2010
08-06461-LT7 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2010)

Opinion


In re: Jack Marvin Winick; Wendy K. Winick, Debtors. Marlys Krietzman, as Trustee of the Sheldon and Marlys Krietzman Family Trust; Andrea D. Bellamy, as Trustee of the Andrea D. Bellamy Trust for the Benefit of Jessica T. Bellamy; and Goldynne Booth, Plaintiffs, v. Jack Marvin Winick and Wendy K. Winick Defendants. No. 08-06461-LT7 Adversary No. 08-90371-LT United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California June 9, 2010

          ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM DECISION

          LAURA S. TAYLOR, JUDGE, United States Bankruptcy Court.

         The Memorandum Decision entered June 3, 2010 is amended as follows: At page 20, the sentence commencing on Line 17 with "Plaintiffs' argument that the Debtors must have built up pools of cash ..." shall be replaced in its entirety by the following sentence:

         "Plaintiffs' argument that the Debtors must have built up pools of cash is not consistent with the evidence from the schedules that the IRS and Franchise Tax Board, who clearly have the resources and tools to locate secreted cash reserves, held liens against Debtors' property and the evidence from the trial testimony that the Debtors sought to avoid the liens of judgment creditors through Winick's lack of formal ownership in and salary from Creative Capital. Tr.114:23-25 and 115:1-20."


Summaries of

In re Winick

United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California
Jun 9, 2010
08-06461-LT7 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2010)
Case details for

In re Winick

Case Details

Full title:In re: Jack Marvin Winick; Wendy K. Winick, Debtors. v. Jack Marvin Winick…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jun 9, 2010

Citations

08-06461-LT7 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2010)