From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wilson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 4, 2010
6 A.3d 1266 (D.C. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-BG-1031.

Filed November 4, 2010.

Bar Registration No. 412722, BDN: 164-10.

Before REID, Associate Judge, TERRY and KING, Senior Judges.


ORDER


On consideration of the certified order from the Superior Court for the Judicial District of Hartford, Connecticut, this court's September 3, 2010, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Douglas C. Wilson, Esquire, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of nine months. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C. 2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI § 14(g).


Summaries of

In re Wilson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 4, 2010
6 A.3d 1266 (D.C. 2010)
Case details for

In re Wilson

Case Details

Full title:In re Douglas C. WILSON, Respondent

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 4, 2010

Citations

6 A.3d 1266 (D.C. 2010)