From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wilson

California Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Sep 24, 2021
No. F083030 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2021)

Opinion

F083030

09-24-2021

In re JOSEPH WILSON, On Habeas Corpus.

Joseph Wilson, in propria persona, for Petitioner. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, and Max Feinstat, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. Kings Super. Ct. No. 95CM1143

Joseph Wilson, in propria persona, for Petitioner.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, and Max Feinstat, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT[*] 1

Petitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal under the constructive filing doctrine set forth in In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 73 (Benoit). In an informal response, the Attorney General contends petitioner “failed to explain the approximate 11 month delay between receiving the trial court's order and attempting to appeal.…” While we recognize this delay was substantial, we conclude petitioner has demonstrated adequate justification for the delay. Based on the record provided, it appears the trial court erroneously failed to appoint petitioner counsel after filing a facially sufficient Penal Code section 1170.95 petition. (People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952.) We conclude this failure significantly undermined petitioner's ability to effectuate his right to appeal the denial of his Penal Code section 1170.95 resentencing petition.

Accordingly, we conclude petitioner is entitled to relief.

DISPOSITION

Petitioner is granted leave to file a notice of appeal on or before 60 days from the date of this order in Kings County Superior Court action No. 95CM1143.

Let a writ of mandate issue directing the Clerk of the Superior Court for Kings County to file said request in its action number No. 95CM1143, to treat it as timely filed, and to proceed with the preparation of the record on appeal in accordance with the applicable rules of the California Rules of Court if the clerk of that court receives said request on or before 60 days of the date of this order.

This opinion is final forthwith as to this court.

[*] Before Poochigian, Acting P.J., Peña, J. and DeSantos, J.


Summaries of

In re Wilson

California Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Sep 24, 2021
No. F083030 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2021)
Case details for

In re Wilson

Case Details

Full title:In re JOSEPH WILSON, On Habeas Corpus.

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 24, 2021

Citations

No. F083030 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2021)

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

We subsequently granted petitioner leave to file a belated notice of appeal within 60 days, and issued a writ…