From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re William D. Hober, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 21, 2017
2016-2181 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 21, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2181

08-21-2017

IN RE: WILLIAM D. HOBER, INC., Appellant

THOMAS HENRY BOYD, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by WESLEY DAVID ANDERSON, STEPHEN ROBERT BAIRD. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, CHRISTINA HIEBER, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 85643266.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS HENRY BOYD, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by WESLEY DAVID ANDERSON, STEPHEN ROBERT BAIRD. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, CHRISTINA HIEBER, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O'MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 21, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re William D. Hober, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 21, 2017
2016-2181 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 21, 2017)
Case details for

In re William D. Hober, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: WILLIAM D. HOBER, INC., Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 21, 2017

Citations

2016-2181 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 21, 2017)