From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wieneke

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 12, 2012
451 F. App'x 955 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1250 Serial No. 10/449,875

01-12-2012

IN RE PAUL R. WIENEKE, SCOTT D. EIKENBERRY, TIM NUFIRE, DAVID A. KOBLAS, AND BRIAN K. WILSON (REAL PARTY IN INTEREST SONICWALL, INC.)


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

COLBY B. SPRINGER, Lewis and Roca LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was TAM THANH PHAM.

JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O'MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

In re Wieneke

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 12, 2012
451 F. App'x 955 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

In re Wieneke

Case Details

Full title:IN RE PAUL R. WIENEKE, SCOTT D. EIKENBERRY, TIM NUFIRE, DAVID A. KOBLAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

451 F. App'x 955 (Fed. Cir. 2012)