From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Whittenburg

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 5, 2006
No. 09-05-409 CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2006)

Opinion

No. 09-05-409 CV

Opinion Delivered January 5, 2006.

Original Proceeding.

Writ Denied.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to vacate a contempt order and dismiss the motion for enforcement. The real part in interest, Jerry Lee Whittenburg, subsequently supplied the Court with a copy of a Rule 11 agreement filed in the trial court and suggested that the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus have been mooted by the Rule 11 agreement and by subsequent developments in the trial court. The relator did not object to the suggestion of mootness. The trial court vacated the contempt provisions of the order of enforcement and the parties agreed to temporary provisions regarding access by the parties to the child. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied without reference to the merits of the issues presented in the petition.


Summaries of

In re Whittenburg

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 5, 2006
No. 09-05-409 CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2006)
Case details for

In re Whittenburg

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KIM WHITTENBURG

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jan 5, 2006

Citations

No. 09-05-409 CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2006)