From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Whitney

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 23, 2016
No. 16-1279 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-1279

06-23-2016

In re: RODNEY W. WHITNEY, Petitioner.

Rodney W. Whitney, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(3:11-cr-0 0 049-FDW-1) Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney W. Whitney, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rodney W. Whitney petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Whitney

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 23, 2016
No. 16-1279 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2016)
Case details for

In re Whitney

Case Details

Full title:In re: RODNEY W. WHITNEY, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 23, 2016

Citations

No. 16-1279 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2016)