From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re White

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 16, 2019
2018-1242 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1242

01-16-2019

IN RE: KHALID AKIL WHITE, DBA BLKMPWR, Appellant

HERBERT THEODORE PATTY, The Law Office of Herbert T. Patty, San Jose, CA, argued for appellant. CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, MARY BETH WALKER, ERICA JEUNG DICKEY.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 86644303.

JUDGMENT

HERBERT THEODORE PATTY, The Law Office of Herbert T. Patty, San Jose, CA, argued for appellant. CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, MARY BETH WALKER, ERICA JEUNG DICKEY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 16, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re White

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 16, 2019
2018-1242 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2019)
Case details for

In re White

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: KHALID AKIL WHITE, DBA BLKMPWR, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 16, 2019

Citations

2018-1242 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2019)