From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Weymouth

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2012
470 F. App'x 105 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-2403

04-02-2012

In re: DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH, Petitioner.

Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(2:03-cr-00082-JBF-FBS-1)

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daniel Anthony Weymouth petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for transfer of supervised release. Weymouth filed a petition for transfer of his supervised release on July 5, 2011. The next day, the district court filed an order informing Weymouth that his petition was deficient and that he had thirty days to cure the deficiency or his petition would be struck from the record. Weymouth filed another petition on July 20, 2011, but there has been no further action by the district court. Weymouth seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Weymouth

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2012
470 F. App'x 105 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

In re Weymouth

Case Details

Full title:In re: DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 2, 2012

Citations

470 F. App'x 105 (4th Cir. 2012)