From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Westervelt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 28, 2017
156 A.D.3d 1316 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

D–214–17

12-28-2017

In the MATTER OF Lisa Millicent WESTERVELT, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 2803237)

Lisa Millicent Westervelt, Provincetown, Massachusetts, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Lisa Millicent Westervelt, Provincetown, Massachusetts, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Mulvey and Rumsey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.Lisa Millicent Westervelt was admitted to practice by this Court in 1997 and lists a business address in Provincetown, Massachusetts with the Office of Court Administration. Westervelt has applied to this Court, by affidavit sworn to October 23, 2017, for leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application, contending that Westervelt is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation because she has failed to fulfill her attorney registration requirements for the most recent biennial period (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Matter of Lee, 148 A.D.3d 1350, 47 N.Y.S.3d 923 [2017]; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1).

In reply to AGC's opposition, however, Westervelt has submitted correspondence in which she indicates that she is now current in her New York attorney registration requirements. Furthermore, Office of Court Administration records likewise establish that Westervelt has duly registered and cured any preexisting registration delinquency. Accordingly, with AGC voicing no other substantive objection to her application, and having determined that Westervelt is now eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons (compare Matter of Levey, 155 A.D.3d 1300, 63 N.Y.S.3d 761 [2017]; Matter of Tierney, 148 A.D.3d 1457, 1458, 51 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2017] ), we grant the application and accept her resignation

ORDERED that Lisa Millicent Westervelt's application for permission to resign is granted and her nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that Lisa Millicent Westervelt's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see generally Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b] ); and it is further

ORDERED that Lisa Millicent Westervelt is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Westervelt is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED that Lisa Millicent Westervelt shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to her.

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Mulvey and Rumsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Westervelt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 28, 2017
156 A.D.3d 1316 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Westervelt

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Lisa Millicent WESTERVELT, an Attorney. (Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 28, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 1316 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
65 N.Y.S.3d 817

Citing Cases

In re Maitland

Furthermore, Office of Court Administration records likewise establish that Maitland has duly registered and…

In re Maitland

Furthermore, Office of Court Administration records likewise establish that Maitland has duly registered and…