From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wells Fargo Mortgage-Backed Certificates Litigation

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Feb 11, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-01376 (SI) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-01376 (SI).

February 11, 2010

MARC T.G. DWORSKY (SBN 157413), MUNGER, TOLLES OLSON LLP, Los Angeles, CA, DAVID H. FRY (SBN 189276), JENNY H. HONG (SBN 251751), MUNGER, TOLLES OLSON LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, WELLS FARGO DEFENDANTS AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS.

BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER GROSSMANN LLP, DAVID R. STICKNEY, TIMOTHY A. DeLANGE, MATTHEW P. JUBENVILLE, San Diego, CA, Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association, Government of Guam Retirement Fund, New Orleans Employees' Retirement System and Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension and Relief Fund.

MUNGER, TOLLES OLSON LLP, MARC T.G. DWORSKY, Los Angeles, CA, DAVID H. FRY, JENNY H. HONG, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for the Wells Fargo Defendants and the Individual Defendants.

WELLS FARGO CO., THOMAS O. JACOB, Office of General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Attorney for the Wells Fargo Defendants.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP, BRUCE A. ERICSON, ANDREW J. LANPHERE, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for the Underwriter Defendants.

FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER JACOBSON LLP, William G. McGuinness (pro hac vice), Stephanie J. Goldstein (pro hac vice), Shahzeb Lari (pro hac vice), New York, New York, Attorneys for the Underwriter Defendants.

SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE BURKE LLP, JAMES J. COSTER (pro hac vice), JOSHUA M. RUBINS, New York, NY, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH ROSATI, KEITH E. EGGLETON, DAVID McCARTHY, Palo Alto, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Moody's Investors Service, Inc.

CAHILL GORDON REINDEL LLP, FLOYD ABRAMS (pro hac vice), ADAM ZUROFSKY (pro hac vice), TAMMY ROY (pro hac vice), New York, NY, PERKINS COIE LLP, DAVID T. BIDERMAN, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON GARRISON LLP, MARTIN FLUMENBAUM (pro hac vice), ANDREW J. EHRLICH (pro hac vice), TOBIAS J. STERN (pro hac vice), New York, NY, TAYLOR COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP, STEPHEN E. TAYLOR, JAY HINES-SHAH, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Fitch, Inc., (d/b/a Fitch Ratings).

MUNGER, TOLLES OLSON LLP, Attorney for the Wells Fargo Defendants and the Individual Defendants.


CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION ECF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DECLARATION OF DAVID H. FRY IN SUPPORT THEREOF


WHEREAS, on August 31, 2009, the Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association, the Government of Guam Retirement Fund, the New Orleans Employees' Retirement System, and the Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension and Relief Fund ("Lead Plaintiffs") filed the Consolidated Class Action Complaint For Violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2) And 15 Of The Securities Act Of 1933 ("Complaint");

WHEREAS, on October 30, 2009, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint, Lead Plaintiffs have opposed such motions, and the motions are fully briefed;

WHEREAS, the Court issued a notice on January 26, 2010 continuing the hearing and Case Management Conference from January 29, 2010 to February 19, 2010;

WHEREAS, Thomas O. Jacob, in-house counsel at Wells Fargo Co., is counsel of record for Defendants Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Wells Fargo Defendants") and will be out of the country on February 19, 2010;

WHEREAS, the next date on which all defense counsel are available is March 19, 2010;

WHEREAS, the Wells Fargo Defendants requested, and Lead Plaintiffs have agreed, to request to continue the hearing and Case Management Conference to March 19, 2010.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties herein, that:

The parties request that the hearing scheduled for February 19, 2010 be continued to March 19, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. and the Case Management Conference scheduled for February 19, 2010 be continued to March 19, 2010 at 2:30 p.m.


Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories listed above.

DECLARATION OF DAVID H. FRY

I, DAVID H. FRY, DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. I am an attorney duly licensed to practice in the State of California and before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. I am an attorney with the law firm of Munger, Tolles Olson LLP, and counsel of record for Defendants Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., David Moskowitz, Franklin Codel, Douglas K. Johnson, and Thomas Neary in the above-captioned action. I have personal knowledge of the matters stated below except those matters stated on information and belief which I am informed and believe are true. If called as a witness in this action, I could and would testify competently to the contents of this declaration.

1. On September 17, 2009, the Court issued an order setting a hearing for Defendants' motions to dismiss and a Case Management Conference on January 29, 2010. On October 5, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation agreeing to revise the previously negotiated briefing schedule but retaining the January 29, 2010 date set by the Court, and the Court signed an order to this effect on October 7, 2009. On January 26, 2010, the Court issued a notice continuing the hearing and Case Management Conference to February 19, 2010;

2. I am informed and believe that Thomas O. Jacob, in-house counsel at Wells Fargo Co. and counsel of record for Defendants Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., will be out of the country on February 19, 2010. I have communicated via electronic mail with all defense counsel, and based on their various responses, I am informed and believe that the next Friday on which all are available is March 19, 2010.

3. Continuing the hearing on the motions to dismiss and the Case Management Conference would not affect or displace other deadlines in this case, as none has been set yet.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was electronically executed this 11th day of February 2010, in San Francisco, California.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In accordance with the parties' stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that:

The hearing scheduled for February 19, 2010 is continued to March 19, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. and the Case Management Conference scheduled for February 19, 2010 is continued to March 19, 2010 at 2:30 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Wells Fargo Mortgage-Backed Certificates Litigation

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Feb 11, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-01376 (SI) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2010)
Case details for

In re Wells Fargo Mortgage-Backed Certificates Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE-BACKED CERTIFICATES LITIGATION

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Feb 11, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-01376 (SI) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2010)