From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Welfare of R.F-D

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Apr 20, 2011
161 Wn. App. 1015 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 41430-9-II (Consolidated with No. 41434-1-II).

Filed: April 20, 2011.

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 10-7-00114-4, David L. Edwards, J., entered October 27, 2010.


Reversed and remanded by un-published opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Worswick, A.C.J., and Johanson, J.


A.F-D., the mother of R.F-D. and J.F-D., appeals from the orders terminating her parental rights. She argues that the juvenile court erred in requiring her to conduct part of her defense in the termination trial pro se because she did not knowingly and voluntarily waive her right to counsel, as required under In re Dependency of G.E., 116 Wn. App. 326, 333, 65 P.3d 1219 (2003). The Department of Social and Health Services concedes that A.F-D. is correct and asks that we remand to allow her to re-open her defense. We accept the Department's concession, vacate the termination orders, and remand to allow A.F-D. to re-open her defense following the appointment of new counsel or a valid waiver of her right to counsel.

A commissioner of this court initially considered A.F-D.'s appeal on accelerated review under RAP 18.13A and then transferred it to a panel of judges.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

WORSWICK, A.C.J. and JOHANSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

In re Welfare of R.F-D

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Apr 20, 2011
161 Wn. App. 1015 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

In re Welfare of R.F-D

Case Details

Full title:In re the Welfare of: R.F-D. and J.F-D, Minors

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two

Date published: Apr 20, 2011

Citations

161 Wn. App. 1015 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011)
161 Wash. App. 1015