From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Welch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 31, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 507308.

December 31, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Elbert Welch, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur.


Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a tier III disciplinary determination which found him guilty of interference with an employee, lying and providing unauthorized legal assistance to another inmate. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary hearing, "inmates have no statutory or constitutional right to their prior housing or programming status" ( Matter of Jackson v Coughlin, 199 AD2d 704, 704; see Matter of Thomas v Selsky, 286 AD2d 535, 535, appeal dismissed 97 NY2d 637). Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he was entitled, the proceeding is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Mosher v Goord, 300 AD2d 726, 726).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Welch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 31, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Welch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ELBERT WELCH, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 1602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 10023
890 N.Y.S.2d 831

Citing Cases

In re Valdez

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the underlying determination has been administratively…

In re Arroyo

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed,…