From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Burstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 13, 2013
214 N.J. 46 (N.J. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-13

In the Matter of Noah M. BURSTEIN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 005231975).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–368, concluding that NOAH M. BURSTEIN of TEANECK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of matter and failure to comply with a client's reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NOAH M. BURSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Burstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 13, 2013
214 N.J. 46 (N.J. 2013)
Case details for

In re Burstein

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Noah M. BURSTEIN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jun 13, 2013

Citations

214 N.J. 46 (N.J. 2013)
66 A.3d 1293

Citing Cases

In re Smith

he deadlines for filing an objection to the motion to dismiss the complaint, violations of RPC 1.4(b) and…

In re Saluti

he appeal or of the appeal's dismissal); In the Matter of James E. Young, DRB 12-362 (March 28, 2013)…