From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Weil

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 4, 1999
738 A.2d 1290 (N.J. 1999)

Opinion

November 4, 1999.


ORDER

This matter having been presented to the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-10(b) following a motion for discipline by consent of BRADLEY J. WEIL of NORTH HALEDON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent acted unethically in two matters, Salcedo and Ferrazzano;

And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct warrants a reprimand;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reviewed the record pursuant to Rule 1:20-10(b)(3) and having determined that respondent's misconduct violated RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest) and RPC 8.4 (conduct involving misrepresentation);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's ethics infractions and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20-16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRADLEY J. WEIL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Weil

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 4, 1999
738 A.2d 1290 (N.J. 1999)
Case details for

In re Weil

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF BRADLEY J. WEIL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 4, 1999

Citations

738 A.2d 1290 (N.J. 1999)
738 A.2d 1290

Citing Cases

In re Weil

In 1999, respondent received a reprimand for misrepresenting the status of a non-lawyer former employee, a…