From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Weil

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 13, 2013
214 N.J. 45 (N.J. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-13

In the Matter of Roger J. WEIL, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 006661979).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–356, concluding that ROGER J. WEIL of MIDDLESEX, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.15(a) (commingling of personal and client funds in trust account), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROGER J. WEIL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Weil

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 13, 2013
214 N.J. 45 (N.J. 2013)
Case details for

In re Weil

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Roger J. WEIL, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jun 13, 2013

Citations

214 N.J. 45 (N.J. 2013)
66 A.3d 1293

Citing Cases

In re Weil

On June 13, 2013, respondent was censured for commingling personal and trust funds in his trust account and…

In re Smith

In fact, we have explicitly rejected an attorney's attempt to legitimize his practice of inflating and…