From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Weil

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 7, 2011
D-137 (N.J. Sep. 7, 2011)

Opinion

D-137 068776

09-07-2011

IN THE MATTER OP ROGER J. WEIL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 006661979)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-040, concluding that ROGER J. WEIL of MIDDLESEX, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(c)(a lawyer shall not prepare on behalf of a client an instrument giving the lawyer or a person related to the lawyer any substantial gift unless the lawyer or other recipient of the gift is related to the client), and RPC 1.16(a)(1)(a lawyer shall not represent a client if it will result in the violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROGER J. WEIL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

WITNESS, the Honorable Stuart Rabner, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 7th day of September, 2011.

The foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

/s/
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

/s/

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT


Summaries of

In re Weil

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 7, 2011
D-137 (N.J. Sep. 7, 2011)
Case details for

In re Weil

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OP ROGER J. WEIL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 006661979)

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Citations

D-137 (N.J. Sep. 7, 2011)