From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Weichsel

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 5, 2012
55 A.3d 64 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-5

In the Matter of John L. WEICHSEL, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 281611972).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–112, concluding that JOHN L. WEICHSEL of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a)(gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client), and RPC 8.4(a)(violation of the RPCs), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN L. WEICHSEL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Weichsel

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 5, 2012
55 A.3d 64 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Weichsel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of John L. WEICHSEL, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Nov 5, 2012

Citations

55 A.3d 64 (N.J. 2012)
212 N.J. 436

Citing Cases

In re Weichsel

Two years later, respondent was reprimanded for gross neglect, lack of diligence, and failure to communicate…

Departmental Disciplinary Comm. for the First Judicial Dep't v. Weichsel (In re (Admitted)

Respondent John L. Weichsel was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by this Court on…