From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Watson

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 25, 2019
236 N.J. 493 (N.J. 2019)

Opinion

D-2 September Term 2018 081786

01-25-2019

In the MATTER OF Raheem S. WATSON, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 034642009)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-101, concluding that Raheem S. Watson of Voorhees, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2009, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Raheem S. Watson is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is furtherORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Watson

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 25, 2019
236 N.J. 493 (N.J. 2019)
Case details for

In re Watson

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Raheem S. WATSON, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

236 N.J. 493 (N.J. 2019)
236 N.J. 493

Citing Cases

In re Lindner

See, e.g., In re Watson, 236 N.J. 493 (2019) (attorney failed to inform his clients that their complaint had…

In re Acciavatti

See, e.g., In re Watson, 236 N.J. 493 (2019) (attorney failed to inform his clients that their complaint had…