Opinion
S281246
05-29-2024
WASHINGTON (RODERICK) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus has been read and considered. Petitioner contends, among other claims, that he is entitled to relief under the Racial Justice Act of 2020 (Pen. Code, § 745) and requests the disclosure of discovery. Petitioner alleges that the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department improperly issued a serious rules violation to petitioner for abusing his phone privileges, and that the prosecutor and the trial judge exhibited bias by indefinitely suspending his phone privileges.
The petition does not satisfy the statutory requirements for the disclosure of discovery under the Racial Justice Act. (Pen. Code, § 745, subd. (d) [providing for disclosure of evidence relevant to violations of the Racial Justice Act; motion requesting such disclosure shall describe the types of records or information sought].)
The petition also fails to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief under the Racial Justice Act. (Pen. Code, § 1473, subd. (e).) The petition fails to allege particularized facts that adequately describe the alleged actions and how they reflected racial bias or animus. Nor does petitioner describe or attach supporting documentary evidence concerning racial bias or animus or the use of racially discriminatory language. (Pen. Code, § 745, subd. (a)(1)-(2); cf. In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with particularity]; cf. also People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary evidence].)
The request for discovery is denied. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.