From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Warren

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 6, 2013
214 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-6

In the Matter of Bruce K. WARREN, Jr., an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 018772002).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–360, concluding that BRUCE K. WARREN, JR., of WOODBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2002, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2) (concurrent conflict of interest) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRUCE K. WARREN, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a Permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Warren

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 6, 2013
214 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2013)
Case details for

In re Warren

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Bruce K. WARREN, Jr., an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jun 6, 2013

Citations

214 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2013)
66 A.3d 1267

Citing Cases

In re Resnick

The DEC pointed out that, although respondent claimed that his representation of C in the pro bono matter had…

In re Warren

In 2013, he received a reprimand for engaging in a conflict of interest and conduct prejudicial to the…