In re Wark

Full title: IN RE: CYNTHIA A. WARK, Appellant

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 9, 2019

2018-1901 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1901

05-09-2019

IN RE: CYNTHIA A. WARK, Appellant

THOMAS YOUNG, Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane P.C., Troy, MI, argued for appellant. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, MOLLY R. SILFEN.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/556,359.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS YOUNG, Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane P.C., Troy, MI, argued for appellant. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, MOLLY R. SILFEN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (TARANTO, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 9, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court