From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ward

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Sep 20, 2023
No. S280863 (Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)

Opinion

S280863

09-20-2023

WARD (JOSEPH VINCENT) ON H.C.


The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary evidence]; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on appeal]; In re Lindley (1947) 29 Cal.2d 709, 723 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that attack the sufficiency of the evidence].)

Jenkins, J., was absent and did not participate.


Summaries of

In re Ward

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Sep 20, 2023
No. S280863 (Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)
Case details for

In re Ward

Case Details

Full title:WARD (JOSEPH VINCENT) ON H.C.

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Sep 20, 2023

Citations

No. S280863 (Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)