From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wang v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 8, 2003
305 A.D.2d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1110

May 8, 2003.

Determination of the Secretary of State, dated January 4, 2001, suspending petitioner's real estate broker's license for untrustworthy conduct until such time as she stops operating as an unlicenced apartment information vendor, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Paula Omansky, J.], entered December 13, 2001) dismissed, without costs.

Pro Se, for petitioner.

David Axinn, for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


The challenged determination is supported by substantial evidence that petitioner's Internet business offered apartment listings and related information for a fee and without a license, in violation of Real Property Law § 446-b, and that although the Department of State repeatedly warned petitioner over a period of years to obtain a license, she refused to do so based on her own interpretation that the licensing requirement does not apply to apartment information vendors who utilize the Internet. Although such defiance has no direct relationship to petitioner's real estate broker's license, no basis exists for disturbing respondent's finding that such defiance demonstrates an untrustworthiness within the meaning of Real Property Law § 441-c(1) warranting suspension of that license (see Matter of Fogel v. Department of State, 209 A.D.2d 615). Petitioner's challenge to the constitutionality of the informational and account maintenance requirements of section 446-c, on the grounds that they are burdensome and impinge upon her commercial free speech and her ability to engage in interstate commerce, fails for lack of standing. Suspension of petitioner's real estate license, the only injury alleged, was based not on any failure to comply with the requirements of section 446-c but on defiance of the licensing requirement of section 446-b.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Wang v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 8, 2003
305 A.D.2d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Wang v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:IN RE LAN LAN WANG, ETC., Petitioner, v. RANDY A. DANIELS, ETC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 8, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 857

Citing Cases

Wang v. Daniels

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 305 App. Div. 2d 186, 757 N. Y.…