From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Walker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

03-10-2016

In the Matter of the Claim of Patricia A. WALKER, Respondent. ExamOne World Wide, Inc., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

DLA Piper LLP, New York City (Erin Carney D'Angelo of counsel), for appellant. James W. Cooper, Warrensburg, for Patricia A. Walker, respondent.


DLA Piper LLP, New York City (Erin Carney D'Angelo of counsel), for appellant.

James W. Cooper, Warrensburg, for Patricia A. Walker, respondent.

Before: GARRY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH, DEVINE and CLARK, JJ.

CLARK, J.

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 26, 2014, which ruled, among other things, that ExamOne World Wide, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions based upon remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

Claimant, a licensed phlebotomist, worked as a mobile exam technician for ExamOne World Wide, Inc., which was in the business of providing a service to its clients, insurance companies, by retaining examiners to conduct medical tests and obtain specimens and medical histories from applicants seeking insurance coverage. After claimant ceased working for ExamOne and applied for unemployment insurance benefits, an Administrative Law Judge determined, following a hearing, that ExamOne was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions based upon remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board upheld the decisions. ExamOne appeals, arguing that claimant and its other mobile examiners were independent contractors and not its employees.

For the reasons set forth in our prior decisions involving similarly situated mobile examiners employed by ExamOne, the decisions of the Board are affirmed (see Matter of Scinta [ExamOne World Wide, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 113 A.D.3d 959, 978 N.Y.S.2d 470 [2014] ; see also Matter of Lawlor [ExamOne World Wide, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 130 A.D.3d 1345, 13 N.Y.S.3d 703 [2015] ; Matter of Dickson [ExamOne World Wide, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 130 A.D.3d 1340, 13 N.Y.S.3d 701 [2015] ). Furthermore, the Board also properly held that the findings of employment applied to other mobile examiners similarly situated to claimant (see Labor Law § 620[1][b] ; Matter of Mitchum [Medifleet, Inc.-Commissioner of Labor], 133 A.D.3d 1156, 1157–1158, 20 N.Y.S.3d 235 [2015] ).

ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

GARRY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Walker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Walker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Patricia A. WALKER, Respondent. ExamOne…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 10, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
137 A.D.3d 1401

Citing Cases

Am. Paraprofessional Sys. of NYC, Inc. v. Comm'r of Labor (In re Reyes)

If there were complaints regarding an examination or the laboratory kit sent by the examiner, APP discussed…