From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wade

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 28, 2015
NO. 03-15-00452-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00452-CV

07-28-2015

In re Don A. Wade


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM CALDWELL COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Don A. Wade, acting pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directed to the Caldwell County Clerk. By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against "a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district" and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. The Caldwell County Clerk is not a party against whom we may issue a writ of mandamus. Nor has Wade demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. We have no jurisdiction to grant Wade any relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland Filed: July 28, 2015


Summaries of

In re Wade

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 28, 2015
NO. 03-15-00452-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2015)
Case details for

In re Wade

Case Details

Full title:In re Don A. Wade

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 28, 2015

Citations

NO. 03-15-00452-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Mendoza

The clerk's failure to file an original complaint does not implicate our jurisdiction; thus, we may not issue…