From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wade

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 17, 2019
NO. 14-19-00772-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 14-19-00772-CV

10-17-2019

IN RE DR. ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR., Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
152nd District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2018-35111

MEMORANDUM OPINION

October 4, 2019, relator Dr. Alex Melvin Wade, Jr. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator, who has been adjudged a vexatious litigant, complains that the Honorable Robert Schaffer, Harris County Administrative Judge, has not ruled on unspecified motions.

Ordinarily, to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, relators must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion, and that they lack an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Dawson, 550 S.W.3d 625, 628 (Tex. 2018) (original proceeding) (per curiam). Relator has not met his burden to provide a sufficient record demonstrating his right to a writ of mandamus. See Walker v. Packer, 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant.


Summaries of

In re Wade

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 17, 2019
NO. 14-19-00772-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2019)
Case details for

In re Wade

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DR. ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR., Relator

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 2019

Citations

NO. 14-19-00772-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2019)