From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vogt

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 23, 2020
No. 20-1933 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1933

11-23-2020

In re: CHRISTINA M. VOGT, Petitioner.

Christina M. Vogt, Petitioner Pro Se. Joseph Umberto Leonoro, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (3:20-cv-00122-GMG-RWT) Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christina M. Vogt, Petitioner Pro Se. Joseph Umberto Leonoro, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christina M. Vogt petitions for a writ of prohibition, seeking an order from this court remanding her removed civil action back to West Virginia state court and awarding her $5,000 in costs and damages.

A writ of prohibition is a "drastic and extraordinary remedy which should be granted only when the petitioner has shown h[er] right to the writ to be clear and undisputable and that the actions of the court were a clear abuse of discretion." In re Vargas, 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983). A writ of prohibition may not be used as a substitute for appeal. Id. The relief sought by Vogt is not available by way of prohibition.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of prohibition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Vogt

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 23, 2020
No. 20-1933 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2020)
Case details for

In re Vogt

Case Details

Full title:In re: CHRISTINA M. VOGT, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 23, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1933 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2020)