In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

Full title: IN RE: VITAMINS ANTITRUST LITIGATION; PFFJ, INC., Plaintiff, -against- F…

Court: United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Oct 28, 2003

(MDLNo. 1285), Misc. No. 99-197(TFH) (D.D.C. Oct. 28, 2003)

Opinion

(MDLNo. 1285), Misc. No. 99-197 (TFH)

October 28, 2003

Barry G. Reed, Esq., Robert R. Hopper, Esq., Timothy J. Becker, Esq., ZIMMERMAN REED P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff HFFJ, Inc.

Mary-Helen Perry, JONES DAY, Washington, D.C., for Aventis Animal Nutrition S.A for purposes of this stipulation, on behalf stipulating Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD: HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.: ROCHE VITAMINS INC.; BASF A.G.: BASF CORPORATION: AVENTIS S.A.: AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA INC.: TAKEDA CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES. LTD.: TAKEDA VITAMIN FOOD USA INC.: AND EISAI CO., LTD .

THOMAS HOGAN, Chief Judge, District

In accordance with Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff PFFJ, Inc. ("Plaintiff) and Defendants F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.; Roche Vitamins Inc.; BASF A.G.; BASF Corporation; Aventis S.A.; Aventis CropScience USA Inc.; Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.; Takeda Vitamin Food USA Inc.; and Eisai Co., Ltd. ("Defendants") stipulate and agree to the dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiff s claims in the above-captioned lawsuit against Defendants. This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiffs claims against any other Defendants or alleged co-conspirators in the above captioned case.

SO ORDERED