From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 9, 2002
MDL No. 1285, Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH) (D.D.C. Dec. 9, 2002)

Opinion

M.D.L. No. 1285, Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH)

December 9, 2002

Attorney for Defendants: Bruce L. Montgomery, Washington, D.C.

Attorney for Plaintiffs: John F. Kinney, Chicago, IL

STIPULATED ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE


Whereas, the parties' in limine motions were served on Friday, November 15, 2002;

Whereas, pursuant to the Court's September 10, 2002 Pretrial Order, oppositions to the parties' in limme motions were to be filed and served on Monday, December 2, 2002, and replies on Friday, December 13, 2002;

Whereas, for the reasons set forth in the parties' Stipulated Order Re: Pretrial Schedule (served on November 19, 2002);

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by the undersigned that:

1. Oppositions to motions in limine shall be served on Wednesday, December 4, 2002, and

2. Replies in support of motions in limine shall be served on Monday, December 16, 2002.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 9, 2002
MDL No. 1285, Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH) (D.D.C. Dec. 9, 2002)
Case details for

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: VITAMINS ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Archer…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Dec 9, 2002

Citations

MDL No. 1285, Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH) (D.D.C. Dec. 9, 2002)