From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 11, 2000
MISC. No. 99-01-97, MDL No. 1285, Case No. 99-CV-3572 (D.D.C. Oct. 11, 2000)

Opinion

MISC. No. 99-01-97, MDL No. 1285, Case No. 99-CV-3572.

October 11, 2000


ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF E. MERCK, MERCK KGA AND E.M. INDUSTRIES, INC . WITH PREJUDICE


AND NOW, this 11th day of October 2000, upon consideration of the foregoing stipulation by Plaintiff and Defendants E. Merck. Merck KGA and E.M. Industries, Inc.

Ordcrtd that The faregowg stipulation of Plaintiff and Defendants B. Merck Merck KOsA and E.M. Industries. Inc. to dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's claims In the abova-captioned case against Defendants E. Merck, Merck KGA and E.M. Industries, Inc. only be and the same is Accepted. Accordiugly, the claims in the above-captioned case of Plaintiff Conopco, Inc. against Defendants E. Merck Merck KGA and E.M. industries, Inc. are hereby dismissed with prejudice. This Order is without prejudice to Plaintiff's claims against any other Defendant or alleged co-conspirators ut the above-captioned cases.


Summaries of

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 11, 2000
MISC. No. 99-01-97, MDL No. 1285, Case No. 99-CV-3572 (D.D.C. Oct. 11, 2000)
Case details for

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In Re: Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, This Document Relates To CONOPCO…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Oct 11, 2000

Citations

MISC. No. 99-01-97, MDL No. 1285, Case No. 99-CV-3572 (D.D.C. Oct. 11, 2000)