From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Nov 17, 2002
Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285, Docket No. 99-5167 (D.D.C. Nov. 17, 2002)

Opinion

Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285, Docket No. 99-5167

November 17, 2002


ORDER DISMISSING BASF AG AND BASF CORPORATION WITH PREJUDICE


This matter being presented to the Court in connection with the Motion of Cargill, Incorporated, The Iams Company, Agribrands International, Inc., CSA Nutrition Services, Inc., formerly known as Carl S. Akey, Inc. and also known as CSA Nutrition, Inc., Nestle Purina Petcare Company, formerly known as Ralston Purina Company and also known as Nestle Ralston PetCare Company, Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., and The Coca-Cola Company (referred to herein as the " Cargill Plaintiffs") to Dismiss BASF Aktiengesellschaft and BASF Corporation with Prejudice, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Fourth Amended Complaint of the Cargill Plaintiffs in this action is dismissed with prejudice solely against defendants BASF Aktiengesellschaft and BASF Corporation. This Order is without prejudice to, and does not affect, the Cargill Plaintiffs' rights or claims against any other defendant in this litigation.


Summaries of

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Nov 17, 2002
Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285, Docket No. 99-5167 (D.D.C. Nov. 17, 2002)
Case details for

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: Vitamins Antitrust Litigation This Document Relates To: Cargill…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Nov 17, 2002

Citations

Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285, Docket No. 99-5167 (D.D.C. Nov. 17, 2002)