From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 30, 2002
Misc. No. 99-197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 2002)

Opinion

Misc. No. 99-197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285

October 30, 2002

Arnold Porter, Bruce L. Montgomery, Esquire, Washington D.C., On behalf all Defendants trying their cases in Washington, D.C.

Dickstein Shapiro Morin Oshinsky LLP, Washington, D.C., On behalf of all Plaintiffs trying their cases in Washington, D.C.


PROPOSED STIPULATED ORDER CONCERNING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE


UPON CONSIDERATION of the record in the above-captioned case, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

(1) The deadline for each side's objections to the admissibility of exhibits identified by the other side is extended to December 2, 2002; and
(2) The deadline for each side's responses to the other side's objections to exhibits is extended to December 16, 2002.


Summaries of

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 30, 2002
Misc. No. 99-197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 2002)
Case details for

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: VITAMINS ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Oct 30, 2002

Citations

Misc. No. 99-197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 2002)