From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 3, 2005
Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285, Docket No. 99-5167 (D.D.C. May. 3, 2005)

Opinion

Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285, Docket No. 99-5167.

May 3, 2005


ORDER DISMISSING CHINOOK GROUP LTD. AND CHINOOK GROUP, INC. WITH PREJUDICE


This matter being presented to the Court in connection with the Motion of Cargill, Incorporated, The Iams Company, Agribrands International, Inc., CSA Nutrition Services, Inc., formerly known as Carl S. Akey, Inc. and also known as CSA Nutrition, Inc., Nestle Purina Petcare Company, formerly known as Ralston Purina Company and also known as Nestle Ralston PetCare Company, Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., and The Coca-Cola Company (referred to herein as the " Cargill Plaintiffs") to Dismiss Chinook Group Ltd. and Chinook Group, Inc. With Prejudice, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Fourth Amended Complaint of the Cargill Plaintiffs in this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either parties solely against defendants Chinook Group Ltd. and Chinook Group, Inc., This Order is without prejudice to, and does not affect, the Cargill Plaintiffs' rights or claims against any other defendant in this litigation.


Summaries of

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 3, 2005
Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285, Docket No. 99-5167 (D.D.C. May. 3, 2005)
Case details for

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: Vitamins Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates To: Cargill…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: May 3, 2005

Citations

Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH), MDL No. 1285, Docket No. 99-5167 (D.D.C. May. 3, 2005)