From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vitamin Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Apr 21, 2003
Case No. 1-99CV2786 (TFH) (D.D.C. Apr. 21, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 1-99CV2786 (TFH)

April 21, 2003

Joseph M. Vanek, DAAR, FISHER, KANARIS VANEK, P.C., Chicago, IL., Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Meijer, Inc. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

Michael O. Ware, MAYER, BROWN, ROWE MAW New York, NY., Attorneys for Defendant Lonza Inc.


STIPULATION AND TFH ORDER


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiffs, Meijer, Inc. and Publix Super Markets, Inc., may have through May 9, 2003 to serve their reply in support of their motion (Verilaw No. 15124) concerning case management in these actions. This request is made to provide the interested parties additional time to meet and confer.


Summaries of

In re Vitamin Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Apr 21, 2003
Case No. 1-99CV2786 (TFH) (D.D.C. Apr. 21, 2003)
Case details for

In re Vitamin Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: VITAMIN ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: MEIJER…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Apr 21, 2003

Citations

Case No. 1-99CV2786 (TFH) (D.D.C. Apr. 21, 2003)