From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vitamin Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 2, 2005
MDL No. 1285, Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH) (D.D.C. May. 2, 2005)

Opinion

MDL No. 1285, Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH).

May 2, 2005

C. Brook Wood, STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Nutra-Blend L.L.C.

W. Todd Miller, BAKER MILLER PLLC, Washington, DC, Counsel for Chinook Group Ltd. and Chinook Group, Inc.


STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF NUTRA-BLEND L.L.C. AGAINST THE CHINOOK DEFENDANTS


Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), it is hereby stipulated and agreed that all claims in the above-captioned case of the Plaintiff Nutra-Blend L.L.C. are dismissed as against Defendants Chinook Group Ltd. and Chinook Group, Inc. with prejudice and without costs to either party. This Stipulated Order is without prejudice to the Plaintiff's claims against any other Defendants in the above-captioned cases.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

In re Vitamin Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 2, 2005
MDL No. 1285, Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH) (D.D.C. May. 2, 2005)
Case details for

In re Vitamin Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In Re: Vitamin Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates to: Nutra-Blend…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: May 2, 2005

Citations

MDL No. 1285, Misc. No. 99-0197 (TFH) (D.D.C. May. 2, 2005)