From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vinzant

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Feb 21, 2020
S259859 (Cal. Feb. 21, 2020)

Opinion

S259859

02-21-2020

VINZANT ON DISCIPLINE


Recommended discipline imposed

The court orders that DAYLE A. VINZANT (Respondent), State Bar Number 195174, is suspended from the practice of law in California for three years, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for three years subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first six months of probation (with credit given for the period of interim suspension which commenced on November 7, 2016, and terminated on March 15, 2018);

2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Decision filed on November 5, 2019; and

3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied, and that suspension will be terminated.

Respondent must provide to the State Bar's Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department in its Decision filed on November 5, 2019. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment.


Summaries of

In re Vinzant

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Feb 21, 2020
S259859 (Cal. Feb. 21, 2020)
Case details for

In re Vinzant

Case Details

Full title:VINZANT ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Feb 21, 2020

Citations

S259859 (Cal. Feb. 21, 2020)