From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vincent Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 4, 2010
70 A.D.3d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 506858.

February 4, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Vincent Gomez, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose, Malone Jr. and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


During a search of petitioner's cell, a correction officer found legal documents belonging to 35 other inmates as well as other papers of a legal nature. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in an unauthorized exchange of personally owned property, providing legal assistance without authorization, possessing contraband and smuggling. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of possessing contraband and smuggling. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with petitioner's testimony in which he admitted to possessing legal materials belonging to other inmates as well as to copying legal decisions from the law library and taking them back to his cell, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Frejomil v LaClair, 46 AD3d 1061, 1061; Matter of Holmes v Brown, 43 AD3d 1234, 1235, lv denied 9 NY3d 815). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to give petitioner notice of the charges in order to enable him to prepare a defense ( see Matter of Arnold v Fischer, 60 AD3d 1177, 1177; Matter of Abdul-Khaliq v Goord, 34 AD3d 872, 872). Furthermore, the record does not reveal that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination at issue flowed from any alleged bias ( see Matter of Linares v Fischer, 59 AD3d 761, lv denied 12 NY3d 709).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Vincent Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 4, 2010
70 A.D.3d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Vincent Gomez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VINCENT GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. BRIAN C. FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 4, 2010

Citations

70 A.D.3d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 747
895 N.Y.S.2d 224

Citing Cases

Williams v. Annucci

Turning to the remaining charges, the misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony at the hearing…

Land v. Fischer

The request for urinalysis form, however, also stated that it was based upon “information received in the…