From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vibrynt, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 15, 2013
534 F. App'x 991 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-1019

2013-10-15

IN RE VIBRYNT, INC.

JILL M. PIETRINI, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for appellant. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 77/701,760.

JUDGMENT

JILL M. PIETRINI, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for appellant.

THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk


Summaries of

In re Vibrynt, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 15, 2013
534 F. App'x 991 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

In re Vibrynt, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE VIBRYNT, INC.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 15, 2013

Citations

534 F. App'x 991 (Fed. Cir. 2013)