Similarly, this court has repeatedly relied on section 161.205 to hold that a trial court did not abuse its discretion by appointing nonparties as managing conservators of a child, even when those nonparties did not affirmatively petition for conservatorship. SeeIn re A.N.S. , No. 04-17-00374-CV, 2017 WL 4518280, at *1–2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Oct. 11, 2017, no pet.) ; In re V.H. , No. 04-16-00054-CV, 2016 WL 3797237, at *3 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 13, 2016, no pet.) ; In re A.D. , 480 S.W.3d 643, 645–46 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015, pet. denied). We agree with Father that it makes little sense to conclude that the Legislature intended for section 161.205 to give the trial court authority to appoint a nonparty managing conservator, but not to order visitation for a nonparty.