From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vessell-Ball

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Sep 13, 2007
No. 09-07-348 CV (Tex. App. Sep. 13, 2007)

Opinion

No. 09-07-348 CV

Opinion Delivered September 13, 2007.

Original Proceeding.

Before GAULTNEY, KREGER, and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Leon Dale Vessell-Ball seeks mandamus relief to compel the trial court to rule upon his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. See Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148-49 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004). On July 18, 2007, we notified the relator that his petition did not comply with appellate rules governing service of original proceedings on the respondent and real party in interest. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5(e), 52.2. We also notified the relator that he must either pay the filing fee or establish his inability to pay. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. We provided an extension of time. The relator neither filed a declaration of inability to pay costs in this proceeding nor certified that he mailed a copy of the petition to the respondent and the real party in interest.

The relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. See In re Lewis, No. 07-04-432-CV, 2004 WL 2074306, at *1 (Tex.App.-Amarillo, Sep. 17, 2004, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]); In re Hensler, 27 S.W.3d 719, 720 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relief on the petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Vessell-Ball

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Sep 13, 2007
No. 09-07-348 CV (Tex. App. Sep. 13, 2007)
Case details for

In re Vessell-Ball

Case Details

Full title:IN RE LEON DALE VESSELL-BALL

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Sep 13, 2007

Citations

No. 09-07-348 CV (Tex. App. Sep. 13, 2007)